Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ulises Blanch vs Martin Cuevas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Blanch vs Cuevas analysis and find out who is favored!
Ulises Blanch vs Martin Cuevas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Blanch 1 - 2 Cuevas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Blanch has won 46.02% of points on his second serve, while Cuevas has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Blanch, in recent form, has won 56.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cuevas has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.76% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Blanch has saved 68.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cuevas has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Blanch has won 61.76% of matches played (W/L 21/ 13), with Cuevas winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 85/ 79). Cuevas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 390/ 285), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10), where as Cuevas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Blanch winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Blanch winning 2 and Cuevas winning 5. The last match between Blanch and Cuevas was at the Murcia Challenger, 04-04-2022, Q3, Clay with Ulises Blanch getting the victory 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Blanch and Cuevas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Blanch winning 1 times and Cuevas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Blanch winning 1, and Cuevas 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Blanch has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.26 while Cuevas has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Blanch has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cuevas has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Blanch has converted 38.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cuevas has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
528
Rank
236
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
838
Rank
271
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
53% (211-186)
Career Total W/L
57% (401-301)
82% (9-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$54,150
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ulises Blanch | Martin Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 5 |
| Games Won | 29 | 40 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 18 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:22 | 1:32:22 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (130/222) | 55% (123/223) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (98/130) | 74% (91/123) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 37% (34/92) | 56% (56/100) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 45% (10/22) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (76/223) | 41% (90/222) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Ulises Blanch
Player
Martin Cuevas
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
105)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Martin Cuevas
Player
Ulises Blanch
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats
Martin Cuevas
Player
Ulises Blanch
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ulises Blanch | Martin Cuevas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (9/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (18/9) | 20% (1/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (137/115) | 42% (26/36) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 82% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.62 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 76 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 213.64 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (480/819) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (357/480) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (156/339) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (38/98) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (341/822) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 82% (9/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Robert Strombachs
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
76%
(
79 of
104)
15
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
38%
(
50 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Matej Dodig
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
30 of
34)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Luca Castagnola
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Louis Dussin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
John Sperle
52%
(
59 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
7
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
4
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Benjamin Pietri
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Cuevas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(5) 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marcel Zielinski
Player
Martin Cuevas
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Cuevas
Player
Vicente Oliver Moratalla
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Cuevas
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
51%
(
58 of
114)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
3
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
41%
(
23 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Martin Cuevas
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Ignacio Galarza
Player
Martin Cuevas
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Cuevas
Player
Tristan Boyer
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
109)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Bocchi
Player
Martin Cuevas
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
39%
(
22 of
57)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
18 of
22)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Martin Cuevas
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Blanch Vs Cuevas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ulises Blanch
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
